瑜伽論記 13.168

13.168

若爾，如何釋同一所緣，不同行相。雖境無別，見用各殊，受為領納想為取像等，見有別故，說不同行相。

If so, how is it explained that they have the identical objective support yet do not have the identical mode of activity? Although the object is not distinct, the functions of seeing are each different: feeling consists of experiencing, conceptualization consists of grasping marks, and so on; because their [modes of] seeing are distinct, they are said not to have the identical mode of activity.