瑜伽論記 13.35

13.35

述曰：執持之言，其義便正，然簡有異，義不同簡。所以者何？先言深細者，但簡凡夫，未簡二乘故；其凡夫藉義皆麁淺。此言深細，但簡凡夫，其二乘教皆深細此應與等，故今以甚簡別二乘，二乘經教深細非甚故，此簡具足故須異也。故下言見諦聖者方能了知餘未能知，見道之前第六識作唯識觀未見第八，入見方知，故言甚深細也。

The commentary says: The phrase 'appropriating and holding' is correct in meaning, yet there is a difference in what it excludes; the meanings do not exclude the same things. Why is this? Previously saying 'deep and subtle' only excluded ordinary beings and had not yet excluded the two vehicles, because the meanings relied upon by ordinary beings are all coarse and shallow. If here it says 'deep and subtle' and only excludes ordinary beings, the teachings of the two vehicles are all deep and subtle and this would be equal to them; therefore, 'profoundly' (甚) is now used to distinguish the two vehicles, because the scriptural teachings of the two vehicles are deep and subtle, but not profoundly so. Because this exclusion is complete, it must be different. Therefore, it says below that only the noble ones who see the truth are able to know it, while the rest are not yet able to know it. Prior to the path of seeing, the sixth consciousness performs the contemplation of consciousness-only and has not yet seen the eighth; entering [the path of] seeing, one only then knows it. Therefore it is said to be 'profoundly deep and subtle'.