瑜伽論記 14.161

14.161

當知此中乃至有所緣故者，此即略解也。補闕云：若諸煩惱事者，現起煩惱事也。若屬彼煩惱者，隨眠種子，由煩惱熏成後煩惱，名屬煩惱。說名依取者，曾所引經。應知此二，亦名所緣者，現惑及種是四識住之所緣藉，故云亦名所緣。言所緣性故者，則前現惑諸煩惱事是緣慮性，名緣慮性也。言有所緣故者，此惑種子能有現惑所緣法也。

The phrase "It should be known that herein, up to 'because there is an intentional object'" is the brief explanation. The Supplement says: "Afflictive events" are the events of manifest afflictions. "Belonging to those afflictions" are the latent seeds; because subsequent afflictions are perfumed by afflictions, they are said to "belong to afflictions." "Said to be based on grasping" refers to the sūtra previously cited. "It should be known that these two are also called intentional objects": manifest afflictions and seeds are the objective reliance for the four stations of consciousness, hence it says they are "also called intentional objects." The phrase "because of the nature of being an intentional object" means that the aforementioned manifest afflictions—the afflictive events—have the nature of cognitive apprehending, hence called having the nature of cognitive apprehending. The phrase "because there is an intentional object" means that these seeds of affliction possess the phenomena that are the intentional objects of manifest afflictions.