瑜伽論記 14.281

14.281

下問答辨。何因緣故至不相捨離者，難意。夫有對礙之法，有一即無第二，云何一微地大之處有餘極微，此初難也。若一微處有餘極微不相妨礙，便同心道無礙之法，云何不名無對性耶？此第二難也。

Below, it is distinguished through questions and answers. From 'For what reason...' to '...are they not separated from one another?': This is the intention of the objection. Now, for dharmas that possess resistance, where there is one, there is no second; how can other atoms exist in the locus of an atom of the earth element? This is the first objection. If there are other atoms in the locus of one atom without impeding one another, then they would be identical to the non-obstructive dharmas of the mental domain; how could they not be termed 'without resistance'? This is the second objection.