瑜伽論記 14.387

14.387

又法生已，餘停住因，不可得故者，泰云：此破正量部色法多時住故。論主難云：生即滅故住因定無。量云：眼等諸法無停住因是有為故猶如心法。

Regarding 'furthermore, after a phenomenon has arisen, another cause for remaining and abiding cannot be apprehended': Tai says: This refutes the Saṃmatīya's view that material phenomena abide for a long time. The author of the treatise challenges them: Because arising is cessation, a cause for abiding is definitely absent. The inference is: 'Phenomena such as the eye have no cause for remaining and abiding (thesis), because they are conditioned (reason), just like mental phenomena (example).'