瑜伽論記 15.371

15.371

前中，外人後自引經難。若心王外別有心所者，何故經說四大空識六界成生不言心所，故今牒末無過失也。故云雖復經言如是六界說名士夫，然密說故無過失。下徵密意，答欲顯色動心法最勝所依，謂六界中，四大是造色所依，空是動性來所依，識是心所心所依，唯說所依。

In the first part, the opponent subsequently cites scripture himself to raise an objection: If there are separate mental factors apart from the primary mind, why does the sūtra say that the six elements of the four great elements, space, and consciousness constitute a sentient being, without speaking of mental factors? Therefore, repeating it now entails no fallacy. Thus it states that although the sūtra says that such six elements are called a person, yet because it was spoken with implicit intent, there is no fallacy. Below it inquires into the implicit intent, answering that it intended to show the supreme supports of form, movement, and mental dharmas. That is, among the six elements, the four great elements are the support of derived form, space is the support of movement's coming and going, and consciousness is the mental support of mental factors—it only speaks of the supports.