瑜伽論記 15.372

15.372

論主返難中，景云：經中說三喻，豈立外更無喻耶？或有處處兼四大種以之為我，豈可四大之外無別造耶？或有處所有色意生，即依此經豈唯色及意二耶？或有處處無色想生，如是豈唯是想生耶？如是經說六處，豈可六外無餘心所等也。

In the treatise master's counter-objection, Jing said: The sūtras state three analogies; could it be that apart from what is posited there are no other analogies? In some places, they combine the four great elements and consider them to be the self; could it be that apart from the four great elements there is no other derived [form]? In some places, there are material beings born of mind; relying on this sūtra, could there be only form and mind, these two? In some places, immaterial beings are born of conception; like this, could it be that they are born solely of conception? In this way the sūtra speaks of six bases; could it be that outside of the six there are no remaining mental factors and the like?