瑜伽論記 16.389

16.389

解邊執見中，心執增益者，景云：問執常可言增益，執斷從壞事生，云何名增益耶？解云：法實無斷，故名增益，此邊執見唯分別起無有俱生者，此據見斷為言。

Regarding "the mind grasps through superimposition" in the explanation of the view grasping extremes (antagrāhadṛṣṭi), Jing says: "Question: Grasping permanence may be called superimposition; since grasping annihilation arises from ruined things, how is it named superimposition? Answer: Since phenomena in reality have no annihilation, it is therefore named superimposition. That this view grasping extremes arises solely from discrimination and lacks the innate is stated with reference to abandonment through seeing."