瑜伽論記 17.89
瑜伽論記 17.89
- Language
- Classical Chinese
17.89
補闕云：二唯隨眠結生相續，謂見聖迹者，對法即云：初之二果纏及隨眠潤生，若不還果唯隨眠潤生，何故相違？
The Buque says: The second is rebirth-linking succession purely by latent dispositions, referring to those who have seen the footprints of the noble. The Abhidharma says that for the first two fruits, both entanglements and latent dispositions moisten rebirth, whereas for the non-returner, only latent dispositions moisten rebirth. Why is there a contradiction?
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation
Linked texts (1)
- 瑜伽師地論 — Classical Chinese