瑜伽論記 18.136

18.136

下破第三，云彼所計法至何況為我之所安住者，離諸蘊法尚無，云何執我安住法，如言石女兒頂繫空華鬘者，重虛累假。應立量云：汝立離蘊之我決定是無，以無所住離蘊法故，如空華鬘繫石女兒頂。

Below, it refutes the third. Regarding "The phenomenon imputed by them... up to... how much less could it be what the self abides in!": phenomena separate from the aggregates do not even exist, so how could one grasp a self abiding in phenomena? It is like saying a garland of sky-flowers is bound to the head of a barren woman's son—a compounding of emptiness and accumulation of unreality. One should establish the formal argument: "The self separate from the aggregates posited by you is definitively non-existent; because the phenomenon separate from the aggregates in which it abides does not exist; like a garland of sky-flowers bound to the head of a barren woman's son."