瑜伽論記 18.137

18.137

下破第四云：若無有蘊；便無有色，非身相應者，汝所計我蘊不相應為我受身，便應不我。亦非苦樂等者，便應無受，亦非眾多等亦應無想，亦非善等便應無行，亦非受用色等境界分別意者，便應無識。若如是者，此我應無所依受相思識。此若無者，此所計我不由功用自然解脫。

Below, it refutes the fourth, stating: "If there were no aggregates, there would be no form and no conjunction with a body": the self imputed by you does not conjoin with the aggregates; if the self were to receive a body, there would be no self. "Nor would there be suffering, pleasure, and so forth": there would then be no feeling. "Nor would there be plurality, and so forth": there would also be no perception. "Nor would there be wholesomeness, and so forth": there would then be no formations. "Nor would there be a discriminating mind that experiences objects such as form": there would then be no consciousness. If so, this self should lack a basis, feeling, conceptual signs, volition, and consciousness. If these are absent, this imputed self would be naturally liberated without effort.