瑜伽論記 19.143

19.143

後有無量一行，順前句等者，準婆沙論一行有兩解。一解：以一行道通理為問名一行。又解：問：不相似法法不以世定名一行。今此論文遂同前解，以一向一名一行故，將狹問寬順前句答，如問輕安起時即有無貪等十以不？答：若有輕安亦有餘十。

Regarding the subsequent "there are immeasurable single practices conforming to the preceding clause, etc.": based on the *Vibhāṣā, "single practice" has two explanations. One explanation: taking a single path of practice penetrating the principle to form a question is called a single practice. Another explanation: questioning dissimilar dharmas that are not definitively named by the worldly convention is called a single practice. Now this treatise text agrees with the former explanation: because "single practice" refers to a definite single orientation, asking about the broader with the narrower conforms to the preceding clause in its answer. For example, if asked, "When pliancy arises, are the ten factors such as non-greed also present?", the answer is: "If pliancy is present, the remaining ten are also present."