瑜伽論記 19.142

19.142

由此道理，應知所餘，亦作四句者，將思對戒及對後三皆不相攝，將信對戒色心異故亦不相攝，將信對第四，若據相應出體得成二句，但第四觀即信觀攝，有信非第四，謂與餘觀相應信，將信對邊對究竟觀，據相應出體皆成二句，次將戒對後三亦不相攝，次將第四對後二論，亦不相攝，第五第六亦不相攝。

Regarding "by this principle, one should know that the remainder also form tetralemmas": matching reflection against morality and against the latter three [realizations], none subsume one another. Matching faith against morality, because matter and mind are distinct, they also do not subsume one another. If one matches faith against the fourth, identifying their essence in terms of association, a dilemma can be formed: whatever is the fourth realization is subsumed under the realization of faith, but there is faith that is not the fourth, namely faith associated with the remaining realizations. Matching faith against the marginal and ultimate realizations, identifying their essence in terms of association, dilemmas are likewise formed in both cases. Next, matching morality against the latter three, they also do not subsume one another. Next, discussing the fourth against the latter two, they also do not subsume one another; the fifth and the sixth also do not subsume each other.