瑜伽論記 19.216

19.216

下次第三辨有空門中，景補闕云：問：為如自性差別假立如是，當言有耶？答：如是言無者，問意，如假立自性差別時名為如，名下即有自性差別定體性耶？解云：尋名執定是其遍計所執無有體性。

Next, in the third gate distinguishing existence and emptiness, Jing supplements the gaps, saying: 'Question: Should it be said to exist in the way that essence and difference are nominally established? Answer: It should be said not to exist in that way.' The meaning of the question is: when essence and difference are nominally established and called 'in that way', is there a fixed essence and difference underneath the name? The explanation says: clinging fixedly by pursuing names is parikalpita, which has no essential nature.