瑜伽論記 19.217

19.217

問：為如分別所行境如是當言有耶？答：當言有者，是因緣有也。如是菩薩乃至善記為非有、非無者，有據因緣有，無據定性無，亦有亦無總前二為第三，非有定性非無因緣假有為第四句，彼由如是善記別故至善說法界者，離定性增離無因緣損滅也。

'Question: Should it be said to exist in the way that it is the objective domain of conceptualization? Answer: It should be said to exist.' This is existence through causes and conditions. 'Thus, the bodhisattva [...] up to [...] skillfully explains it as neither existent nor nonexistent': existence is based on existence through causes and conditions; nonexistence is based on the nonexistence of a fixed nature; both existent and nonexistent combines the previous two as the third clause; neither existent [as a fixed nature] nor nonexistent [as a nominal existence through causes and conditions] is the fourth clause. 'Because of skillfully resolving it in this way [...] up to [...] skillfully expounding the dharma-realm': this is free from the reification of a fixed nature and free from the nihilistic annihilation of causes and conditions.