瑜伽論記 19.257

19.257

章云：相三依所攝，除智依；智依，唯本性相智也。依法不依人中，相亦是法者，影像相聽法徒眾識心上聚集顯現教法也。又名唯法依所攝，故知了義經教所詮，取了義不取能詮教，又名、唯法依者，本性相教與相中法依影像相別，如相分別亦爾，三依所攝除智依，分別既是法依所攝，故知不依智，依人非唯教法也。真如唯識依所攝正智唯智依所攝。

The chapter says: Signs are subsumed under three reliances, excluding reliance on wisdom; reliance on wisdom is solely the wisdom of inherent signs. In relying on the Dharma and not on the person, signs are also the Dharma: this refers to the teaching-phenomena aggregated and manifested on the minds of the audience listening to the Dharma as image signs. Furthermore, name is subsumed solely under reliance on the Dharma; hence we know that what is expressed by the teaching of sūtras of definitive meaning takes the definitive meaning and does not take the expressing teaching. Furthermore, as for name being solely reliance on the Dharma: the teaching of inherent signs is distinct from the image sign of reliance on the Dharma within signs. As with signs, so too is discrimination: it is subsumed under three reliances, excluding reliance on wisdom; since discrimination is subsumed under reliance on the Dharma, we know that non-reliance on wisdom and reliance on persons are not merely teaching-phenomena. Tathatā is subsumed solely under reliance on consciousness; correct wisdom is subsumed solely under reliance on wisdom.