瑜伽論記 19.259

19.259

備、基師云：相除智依以正智相非正智故，教體即名故名屬法依，分別染法依三依攝同相，所以類解，真如是所緣門故義依所攝，智是能緣義故依所攝。然即義依但約等緣境門，智依但約能緣義邊。

Masters Bei and Ji say: Signs exclude reliance on wisdom because the sign of correct wisdom is not correct wisdom itself; the substance of teaching is simply name, and therefore name belongs to reliance on the Dharma. Discrimination, as contaminated phenomena, is subsumed under the three reliances just as signs are, which explains the analogous interpretation. Tathatā, being the approach of the objective domain, is subsumed under reliance on the meaning; wisdom, being the meaning of the cognitive agent, is subsumed under reliance on wisdom. However, reliance on meaning is based solely on the approach of equally conditioning the objective realm, while reliance on wisdom is based solely on the side of the cognitive agent.