瑜伽論記 19.433

19.433

問：行者入觀觀於骨聚，骨聚後時際遣，為由定心執有實骨故須除遣，為不執實而須除遣，若執實者定心即有法執，有法執故即有無明，有無明故不應名定，若不執實所觀骨聚，是依他性，今遣骨聚即遣依他，云何復言不遣依他？

Question: When a practitioner enters contemplation to contemplate a heap of bones, and the heap of bones is subsequently eliminated, is it because the concentrated mind clings to there being actual bones that they must be eliminated, or does one not cling to them as actual and yet they must be eliminated? If one clings to them as actual, the concentrated mind then has clinging to phenomena; having clinging to phenomena, there is then ignorance; having ignorance, it should not be called concentration. If one does not cling to them as actual, the contemplated heap of bones is of the paratantra nature. Now, eliminating the heap of bones would mean eliminating the paratantra. Why do you say again that it does not eliminate the paratantra?