瑜伽論記 19.456

19.456

言如依遠離性，說彼為空至亦爾者，前明依他是因緣，因緣法外離自然生及離勝義故說為空。今明依他即體無我異說空義，故云依異相性為無我，亦可明此依他法體無我，異於遍計所執我無，故云依異相性說為無我。

Regarding the words from 'Just as based on the nature of being far removed, they are spoken of as empty' up to 'is also like this': Previously it was clarified that the paratantra is causally conditioned, and because causal phenomena are externally removed from spontaneous production and removed from ultimate reality, they are spoken of as empty. Now it clarifies that the paratantra is substantially non-self, which is a different explanation of the meaning of emptiness. Hence it says 'based on the nature of distinct characteristics, it is non-self.' Alternatively, it clarifies that the substance of this paratantra phenomenon is non-self, which is distinct from the non-existence of a self as falsely conceptualized by parikalpita; hence it says 'based on the nature of distinct characteristics, it is spoken of as non-self.'