瑜伽論記 19.500

19.500

前中，依義遍計義自性者，忽見一物，由不了其名分別其事，不同攝論依鍮遍計金等。依二遍計二自性者，直爾分別色體及分別色名，即依自色體分別色體，及依自色名分別色名，故言依二分別。二自性者，依色名體執色名體，由四蘊名體執四蘊名體。

In the former, regarding 'relying on the referent to imagine the intrinsic nature of the referent': suddenly seeing an object, due to not understanding its name, one discriminates its actual reality; this is not like relying on brass to imagine gold as in the Mahāyānasaṃgraha. In 'relying on both to imagine the two intrinsic natures': directly discriminating the substance of form and discriminating the name of form, which means relying on the substance of one's own form to discriminate the substance of form, and relying on the name of one's own form to discriminate the name of form; hence it says 'relying on both to discriminate'. 'The two intrinsic natures' means relying on the name and substance of form to grasp the name and substance of form, and relying on the name and substance of the four aggregates to grasp the name and substance of the four aggregates.