瑜伽論記 2.241

2.241

應無染污者，六十五云：若無有蘊，便無有色，與身相應，廣說乃至如是此我應無所依，無受無想無思慮等亦無分別，是則此我不由功用究竟解脫即無有染污，是故此計不應道理。量云：我應無染污，任運解脫，許不屬蘊故，如虛空等。又應不言我有色等，許不屬蘊故，如兔角等。不應相屬者，是我有色等義非攝屬義。

Regarding ‘It should be without defilement’: fascicle sixty-five says, ‘If there were no aggregates, there would be no form associated with the body...’ and speaking broadly up to ‘...likewise, this self would have no basis, no feeling, no conception, no thought, etc., and also no discrimination; thus this self, without effort, would be definitively liberated, which means it would have no defilement; therefore, this assertion is illogical.’ The syllogism is: The self should be without defilement and spontaneously liberated; because it is accepted not to pertain to the aggregates; like space, etc. Furthermore, one should not say ‘I have form, etc.’; because it is accepted not to pertain to the aggregates; like the horns of a hare, etc. ‘Should not pertain to each other’ has the meaning of ‘my having form, etc.’, not the meaning of subsumption.