瑜伽論記 2.262

2.262

次無我見，若言是善者，外道亦讚，無我見故，唯廣百論文，有外道宗，明聞思位說有我，修慧證於無我。若言不善而一切智等者，此從彼師名一切智讚無我見速證涅槃，今說為不善故不應道理，若說佛為一切智讚無我見他不信故。有釋：此說佛為一切智者，非外道師也。此中所破意通佛法之內，犢子部等計我，故云也。

Next, regarding the view of no-self: if you say it is wholesome, non-Buddhists also praise the view of no-self, for only in the text of the Guangbai lun (Śataśāstrakārikāvṛtti) is there a non-Buddhist school explaining that in the stages of hearing and thinking they speak of a self, while through cultivated wisdom they realise no-self. If you say it is unwholesome, yet an omniscient one [praises it]: this refers to their teacher, titled 'Omniscient One', who praised the view of no-self as quickly realising nirvāṇa; to say now that it is unwholesome is therefore unreasonable. If it meant that the Buddha is the Omniscient One praising the view of no-self, others would not believe it. There is another explanation: this mentions the Buddha as the Omniscient One, not a non-Buddhist teacher. The intent of what is refuted here extends to within the Buddhadharma, refuting the Vātsīputrīyas and others who posit a self; hence it is stated thus.