瑜伽論記 20.406

20.406

備、基師云：攝論言無有餘法能取餘法，此識如此及生顯現，由此舊解能緣心外無餘能取，及境外無餘所取。今此論意欲辨大乘見相諸法既無作用我是能緣我是所緣但心清淨故，一切諸相於心顯，故名取境，廣如佛地論。又此文意無有小法能有作用，何況諸心及相得有作用，是故諸法生時但是唯識無作用生，由此道理不同昔解。

Masters Bei and Ji say: The Mahāyānasaṃgraha states that there is no other dharma capable of grasping another dharma; this consciousness arises and appears in such a manner. From this, the older interpretation held that outside the apprehending mind there is no other grasper, and outside the object there is no other grasped. Now the intention of this treatise is to distinguish that in the Mahāyāna, since all dharmas of viewing and image lack functional activity—'I am the grasper,' 'I am the grasped'—merely because the mind is pure, all images appear in the mind, which is therefore called 'grasping an object,' as detailed in the Buddhabhūmisūtra-śāstra. Furthermore, the meaning of this text is that not even a minor dharma can have functional activity, how much less could minds and characteristics have functional activity? Therefore, when dharmas arise, it is merely consciousness-only arising without functional activity; on this principle it differs from the former interpretation.