瑜伽論記 20.444

20.444

言若於其名等已下者，答第三問云何觀行除遣諸相。今答，先於地前，尋思如實種種推求，知名等假，今入見道證真如時，境智平等無分別行，不得名性不得名所依，唯識門中名依於識識是所依，故曰若於其名及名自性無所得時亦不彼所依之相如是除遣。

The words 'If with respect to its name, etc., down to...' answer the third question of how contemplation practice eliminates characteristics. Now the reply is: previously, before the grounds, through investigation and searching according to reality in various ways, one knew that names and the rest are nominal; now, upon entering the path of seeing and realizing tathatā, object and wisdom are equal in nonconceptual practice, where one does not apprehend the nature of the name nor apprehend the basis of the name. In the approach of consciousness-only, names depend upon consciousness, and consciousness is the basis; therefore it says: 'If, when nothing is apprehended regarding the name and the intrinsic nature of the name, one also does not observe the characteristic of that upon which it depends; in this way they are eliminated.'