瑜伽論記 20.449

20.449

又解：有見無相，言我說了知至非此了達餘所能伏者，未證已前，取法義相，正證如時，伏前所取法義之相，非此正證了達如時，更有諸相為餘能伏，故言非此了達餘所能伏。

Another explanation says: There is the subjective aspect but no objective image. The text says: 'I say that knowing, down to: cannot be subdued by anything other than this comprehension': prior to realization, one grasped the characteristics of Dharma and meaning; at the time of directly realizing tathatā, one subdues those previously grasped characteristics of Dharma and meaning; it is not that at the time of this direct realization and comprehension of tathatā, there are further characteristics that could be subdued by anything else; hence it says 'cannot be subdued by anything other than this comprehension.'