瑜伽論記 21.51

21.51

基云：害伴隨伴者，第六識俱生身見等攝，說名俱生，故所餘煩惱名非俱生。然體稍麁，因彼而起，由彼斷故，此亦隨無，故名害伴。羸劣隨眠者，謂第六七地微細現行若修所伏不現行故，非俱生身見斷，此亦隨眠滅，稍難斷故，不違楞伽經，俱生身見斷故貪即不生，彼約二乘斷煩惱說，不依菩薩所知障無故煩惱不生說，或依二隨眠究竟斷位，彼經此經，亦不相違。微細隨眠者，謂於第八地已上，如彼唯識章釋。

Ji says: 'Regarding "the companion of the harmed companion," this is subsumed under the co-arising view of self and so forth in the sixth consciousness, which is termed co-arising, and therefore the remaining defilements are called non-co-arising. However, their substance is somewhat coarse, and they arise dependent on it; because that is abandoned, these also disappear accordingly; hence they are called "harmful companions." Regarding "debilitated dormant defilements," this refers to subtle active ones in the sixth and seventh stages that do not become active because they are subdued by cultivation; it is not the abandonment of the co-arising view of self, but the extinguishing of these dormant defilements as well, which is somewhat difficult to abandon. Thus it does not contradict the Laṅkāvatārasūtra's statement that because the co-arising view of self is abandoned, craving is not generated. That was spoken in reference to the two vehicles abandoning defilements, not in reliance on the bodhisattva's non-generation of defilements due to the absence of the cognitive hindrance; or it relies on the stage where the two dormant defilements are completely abandoned. Thus that sūtra and this sūtra do not contradict each other. "Subtle dormant defilements" refers to those in the eighth stage and above, as explained in the Treatise on Consciousness-Only.'