瑜伽論記 23.39

23.39

第二約問梵行辨無亂記中，景師云：或後有言何因緣故乃於沙門喬答摩所修習梵行等者，當瑜婆摩羅子。若得此問至名不亂記者，或有問言，何故乃於眾多沙門中偏標噵踰婆摩羅子等名修梵行，不噵餘人名耶？若得此問，應如前說，若於眾中全不標一人之名，則不知說何等眾修習梵行，復成損減，若廣述餘沙門，名則大繁廣，便成增益，今呼一名等餘一切，離於增減。

In the second, differentiating answering without confusion regarding questions about the holy life: Master Jing says: Regarding 'Or if someone later says, "For what cause and condition do you cultivate the holy life under the recluse Gautama?"' and so forth: this corresponds to [Dabba] Mallaputta. Regarding 'If one receives this question, up to being called answering without confusion': someone might ask, 'Why among many recluses do you specifically designate the son of Mallaputta and so forth as cultivating the holy life, and not mention the names of others?' If one receives this question, one should explain as before: if within the assembly one does not mention the name of a single person at all, then it would not be known what kind of assembly is said to cultivate the holy life, which would furthermore constitute depreciation; if one extensively recounted the names of the remaining recluses, it would be overly voluminous, which would constitute superimposition; now, naming one person represents all the rest, which is free from superimposition and depreciation.