瑜伽論記 24.112

24.112

第六解請問，後四種者，謂一切皆無常等，明一向記。故思造業已下，明分別記，景師解云：故思造業當受於苦，此非一向獲得者，此業通於善惡，云何定言當受於苦。捨現法中定般涅槃，亦非一向者，離捨、苦、樂、捨受不定現般涅槃以通凡聖皆得捨故，此二復次當分別記。達師云：或得於捨者，此故思所造業，或有捨却義；於現法中定般涅槃，亦非一向者，若有人問言一切聖人定於現法中般涅槃耶？今分別答言非一向以不定故。

Sixth, it explains questioning. Regarding "the latter four kinds," this refers to 'all are impermanent,' etc., clarifying categorical declaration. From "intentionally creating karma" downward, it clarifies analytical declaration. Master Jing explains: "'Intentionally creating karma, one will experience suffering'—this is not categorically obtained; because this karma pertains to both good and evil, how could one definitely say one will experience suffering? 'Abiding in the present phenomenon, one definitely realizes parinirvāṇa' is also not categorical; because apart from equanimity, suffering, and pleasure, the feeling of equanimity does not definitely lead to realizing parinirvāṇa in the present, since both ordinary persons and nobles can attain equanimity; these two alternatives should be declared analytically." Master Da says: "Regarding 'or one obtains equanimity': this karma intentionally created may have the sense of being set aside; 'in the present phenomenon one definitely realizes parinirvāṇa' is also not categorical: if someone asks, 'Do all noble persons definitely realize parinirvāṇa in the present phenomenon?', one now answers analytically, saying it is not categorical because it is indefinite."