瑜伽論記 24.324

24.324

第二義云：此中四諍，不可別配律中四諍，但判前七為四句也。謂初四句若他舉諍事，即是現前憶念不癡自言滅也；次一句名互擬諍事，即是多人語滅也；次一句名自舉諍事，即是罪處所滅也；後一句名互舉諍事，即是草覆地所滅，後解為勝。

The second explanation says: The four disputes here cannot be individually matched with the four disputes in the Vinaya; they merely partition the previous seven [settlements] into four clauses. That is, if the first four clauses concern 'disputes of other-accusation', they are settled by presence, recollection, non-confusion, and confession. The next one clause, called 'disputes of mutual suspicion', is settled by majority decision. The next one clause, called 'disputes of self-accusation', is settled by the determination of the offense. The final clause, called 'disputes of mutual accusation', is settled by covering with grass. This latter interpretation is superior.