瑜伽論記 8.154

8.154

下結趣入三苦論文前後不同者，以性相求隨義便解，又釋攝義門別，彼論約三苦攝八苦故知五是苦苦，此論以三行攝八苦故不可愛行是前七行，今以苦攝三行故苦苦攝不可愛行是苦苦，不以苦苦攝不可愛行所攝七苦為苦苦也。故不相違，攝義門別。

As for the concluding entry into the three sufferings below differing in the sequence of the treatise's text: it is explained according to the convenience of the meaning when sought through intrinsic nature and characteristics; again, it is explained through the difference in the approaches of subsumptive meaning. That treatise, based on the three sufferings subsuming the eight sufferings, concludes that five are the suffering of suffering. This treatise, using the three aspects to subsume the eight sufferings, takes the disagreeable aspect as the prior seven aspects. Now, using suffering to subsume the three aspects, the suffering of suffering subsumes the disagreeable aspect as the suffering of suffering; it does not take the seven sufferings subsumed by the disagreeable aspect to be the suffering of suffering through the suffering of suffering. Therefore, they do not contradict one another; it is [simply] a difference in the approaches of subsumptive meaning.