瑜伽論記 8.283

8.283

（泰云：）據無種姓人及二乘定性說。（基云：）旦有三釋，假設為論，是第一說。決定二乘種姓亦名無大乘種姓，雖復隨緣發菩提心亦不堪任故，故說雖發心等，是第二釋。即法爾無性人實雖發心究竟退不能得彼無上菩提，此第三說。

(Tai says:) This is stated based on persons without gotra and those with the determinate nature of the two vehicles. (Ji says:) For now there are three explanations: treating it hypothetically is the first explanation. Determinate two-vehicle gotra is also named lacking the Mahāyāna gotra, and although they might generate the bodhicitta according to conditions, they are still incapable, so it is said that 'even though generating the aspiration...', which is the second explanation. Persons innately without gotra, even if they actually generate the aspiration, will ultimately regress and cannot attain that unexcelled awakening; this is the third explanation.