瑜伽論記 9.143

9.143

言亦非眾多假說詮表決定可得乃至非餘假說者，論主前難，若隨起言說即有自性，是即一法有其多名，隨說多名應有多體，恐彼外人得如此難，我即印言隨其多名即有多體，故此遮云：亦非眾多假說詮表決定即有多體可得，謂隨一多假說眼時有眼別體，非餘根名見名目，乃至隨說目名即有目體等。

Regarding "nor is it definitively obtainable that numerous metaphorical designations designate and express [...], and not other metaphorical designations": the author of the treatise previously posed the objection that if intrinsic nature existed as soon as speech is uttered, then a single phenomenon having many names would have to have multiple entities in accordance with the manifold names uttered. Fearing that the opponent might meet this objection by simply assenting, saying, "In accordance with the manifold names there indeed are multiple entities," he therefore refutes this, saying: It is also not definitively obtainable through multiple metaphorical designations and expressions that multiple entities are obtained—meaning that when the eye is designated metaphorically by one of many names, there is a distinct entity of the eye, and not the names of other faculties, the name "sight", or the name "vision", and so forth down to when the name "vision" is uttered, only the entity of vision exists, and so forth.