瑜伽論記 9.155

9.155

泰云：如初生小兒未解柱青黃長短等色名，故當爾見柱不起青黃長短等覺，後由依柱青黃長短等假名故方起此覺，若未立名前見柱時於柱青黃等色法之柱等色事應起青黃長短等覺，而實不起，故知眼識見柱依他性不可言說，法外所有立青黃長短等可言說，分別性自性能隨言說起也。

Tai says: For instance, a newborn child does not understand the names of matter such as "pillar", "blue", "yellow", "long", or "short"; therefore, when looking at a pillar at that time, no awareness of blue, yellow, long, or short arises. Later, relying on metaphorical names such as the pillar's blue, yellow, long, or short, this awareness only then arises. If before establishing the name, when seeing the pillar, an awareness of blue, yellow, long, or short ought to arise with respect to the pillar and other material things of the matter phenomena like blue and yellow, yet in reality it does not arise, we know that the eye-consciousness seeing the pillar's paratantra nature is beyond speech, whereas all the superimpositions outside the phenomenon, like blue, yellow, long, and short, are expressible in speech, and the intrinsic nature of conceptualized nature can arise in accordance with speech.