瑜伽論記 9.187

9.187

泰云：謂由於此分別彼分別性無所有，即由分別故正觀為空，復由於此分別性餘依真實，即由餘依他故如實知有，如是名為悟解空性如實無倒，此中雖證依他真實是有，意欲明分別性空約有以明空，但說悟入空性不言悟入有性也。

Tai says: This means that due to this conceptual differentiation, that conceptually differentiated nature is non-existent; thus, because of the conceptual differentiation, one correctly contemplates it as empty. Furthermore, due to the remainder of this conceptually differentiated nature—the basis in the real—that is, due to the remaining paratantra, one knows in accordance with reality that it exists. This is termed understanding the nature of emptiness truly and without error. Here, although it proves that the paratantra and the real are existent, the intention is to clarify the emptiness of the conceptually differentiated nature; by relying on existence it clarifies emptiness, speaking only of awakening to the nature of emptiness, without speaking of awakening to the nature of existence.