瑜伽論記 9.204

9.204

言亦無有餘色等性法者有兩釋。一云，遠師云：對彼有故說為餘法，非定無故言亦無有餘色等法性，此說不然。若依舊論云：色等法亦無餘自性，是故作如是釋。今依新論云：亦無有餘色等性法，故知餘者非色家之無也。

As for "there are also no other phenomena of the nature of form and so forth", there are two explanations. One says: Master Yuan says: "Because it is contrasted with existence, it is spoken of as 'other phenomena'; because it is not definitively non-existent, it says 'there are also no other phenomena of the nature of form and so forth.'" This statement is incorrect. If one follows the old treatise, which says: "phenomena such as form also have no other intrinsic nature," it was explained in this way. Now, following the new treatise, which says: "there are also no other phenomena of the nature of form and so forth," we know that "other" does not mean the non-existence of the category of form.