瑜伽論記 9.205

9.205

今解，此釋前文云：亦非離彼別有自性是言所行，是言境界者，此有兩釋。一云，彼離依他已外有別自性，一一遍破轉計，云我宗色等諸法雖假建立離色等以外別有色等性法即是六句中，第四大有句義。是故遍破云：亦無有餘色等性法，而於其依他起中，圓成實性真實是有。

Now to explain: this explains the earlier text stating: "Nor is there, apart from that, a separate intrinsic nature that is the sphere of speech, the object domain of speech." Here there are two explanations. One says: Apart from the paratantra, there is a separate intrinsic nature. One by one, it completely refutes shifted conceptualizations, which claim: "In our school, although all phenomena such as form are provisionally established, apart from form and so forth there are separately phenomena of the nature of form and so forth—that is, the fourth category of great existence among the six categories." Therefore, it universally refutes them, stating: "there are also no other phenomena of the nature of form and so forth, yet within the paratantra, the pariniṣpanna nature truly exists."