瑜伽論記 9.256

9.256

泰云：此中雖通舉分別，然前三法分別是本故，但約前三分別與所依約名義事互相生，後五分別境更無別體，又不通名義，故不別說。

Tai says: Although conceptualisation is mentioned generally here, because the first three dharma-conceptualisations are the root, reciprocal generation is explained only between the first three conceptualisations and the bases and objects in terms of name, referent, and thing. The objects of the latter five conceptualisations have no separate essence, nor do they extend to name and referent; hence they are not explained separately.