瑜伽論記 9.76

9.76

然護法正義但無分別智見有相無，餘心心所二分俱有。故瑜伽七十三云：說無相取不取相故，而觀所緣云：帶彼相起名所緣者。說帶相言有其二義：一、帶影像相故名為帶相；二云：挾帶體相故名帶相。無分別智雖無所帶影像相分，然即挾帶真如相起，所以者何？能緣見分不離真如，是內證故，約有一心見及說三心為真見道中。

However, the orthodox position of Dharmapāla is simply that non-conceptual knowledge has the perceiving aspect but lacks the perceived aspect, and the remaining minds and mental factors possess both parts. Therefore, fascicle seventy-three of the Yogācāra says: it is said to be signless grasping because it does not grasp signs. Yet the Ālambanaparīkṣā states: "taking on that appearance in arising is called the cognitive object." This statement of "taking on the appearance" has two meanings: first, taking on an image-aspect, hence called "taking on the appearance"; second, embracing the intrinsic aspect of the entity, hence called "taking on the appearance." Although non-conceptual knowledge lacks the image-aspect part that is taken on, it nevertheless arises embracing the aspect of tathatā. Why is this? Because the perceiving aspect that cognizes is not separate from tathatā; it is internal direct realization. In terms of there being a single-mind view and teaching the three minds within the true path of seeing,