瑜伽論記 2.225

2.225

The second interrogation says: ‘Does this awareness arise solely from the own-nature of this dharma, etc.?’ The intention here is to ask: does the awareness of self arise from the own-nature of the cognized object, or from elsewhere? If the awareness of self arises from the own-nature of the cognized dharma, how can you say that asserting a self identical with the aggregates is called inverted? The syllogism is: The mind grasping form as the self in your assertion should not be inverted; because it is accepted as conforming to its intentional object; like the knowledge of another's mind, etc.