瑜伽論記 2.225

2.225

第二徵云：為唯由此法自體起此覺耶等者，此意問：於所覺境自體，起我覺為於餘處，若於所覺法自體起我覺者，汝如何說即蘊計我，名為顛倒？量云：汝執色我心應非顛倒，許順所緣故，如他心智等。

The second interrogation says: ‘Does this awareness arise solely from the own-nature of this dharma, etc.?’ The intention here is to ask: does the awareness of self arise from the own-nature of the cognized object, or from elsewhere? If the awareness of self arises from the own-nature of the cognized dharma, how can you say that asserting a self identical with the aggregates is called inverted? The syllogism is: The mind grasping form as the self in your assertion should not be inverted; because it is accepted as conforming to its intentional object; like the knowledge of another's mind, etc.