瑜伽師地論略纂 10.66

10.66

論解第三真實中云「若能引無漏智者，非有漏加行智故」。云何煩惱障淨智所行真實不緣無為涅槃耶？義曰：論云不正是緣涅槃智，此能引無漏智緣涅槃，亦說此加行為此中收。

Regarding the treatise's explanation under the third reality, which states: "If it is capable of inducing uncontaminated wisdom, it is not contaminated preparatory wisdom": Why does reality that is the sphere of action of the purified wisdom regarding the afflictive obscurations not take unconditioned nirvāṇa as its object? The interpretation says: The treatise states that it is not precisely the wisdom that takes nirvāṇa as its object; [yet] this wisdom that can induce uncontaminated wisdom takes nirvāṇa as its object, so this preparatory [wisdom] is also said to be included here.