瑜伽師地論略纂 10.69

10.69

論云「言非有，謂即諸色假說自性乃至皆無所有，是名非有」等者，此意明謂如遍計假說諸色等自性為無事無相，即色等無事無相故，所依言說說言假說者，此無事無相所依名言一切都無，所依無故，諸計有色等此皆無所有，是名非有。如是名計有非有皆遍計所執，聖者除之，名為中道。

Regarding the treatise's statement: "The term 'non-existence' refers to the conventional self-nature of forms... up to: all are completely non-existent; this is termed 'non-existence'" and so forth: this meaning clarifies that, just as when one imagines the conventional self-nature of forms and so forth to be without fact and without characteristic, precisely because forms and so forth lack fact and characteristic, the expressive conventions upon which they rely to speak of 'conventional designation'—these expressive conventions upon which the absence of fact and characteristic relies—are entirely non-existent. Because their basis is non-existent, all imagined forms and so forth are completely non-existent; this is termed 'non-existence'. In this way, imagining existence and non-existence are both the imaginary nature (parikalpita-svabhāva); the noble ones eliminate them, which is called the Middle Way.