瑜伽師地論略纂 10.72

10.72

上來正解有空慧勝利，若合初二，解為三段文；若義，即為四段。此中先總為三段，合義分為四段，故云第三、第四等。從「當知此中」下，反知淨義。此下有四：第一、由無空慧故，不如實知生死，即雜染心流轉生死，此反解合解中第一、於涅槃不怖畏；第二、若以無常行厭生死，則速疾入涅槃，即反解合中第二、亦於涅槃不多願樂；第三、若無智故，於其涅槃深心怖畏，即於能證涅槃資糧不能圓滿，常處生死，即反解上第三、遠離一切法淨勝解等；第四、若無悲故，於其涅槃多住離樂，即便速疾入般涅槃，即反解第四、不能成就佛法、有情。今結反解，故論云「是諸菩薩於無上正等菩提無大方便」。次第三種解四義，以理准文可知。或第一、正明四義，此初立宗；當知此中反解下，重釋前義。就重釋中二：初、反解四義；第二、正釋四義。

The above correctly explains the benefits of possessing the wisdom of emptiness. If the first two are combined, the text is explained as three sections; in terms of meaning, there are four sections. Here, it is first broadly treated as three sections, but in terms of combined meaning it is divided into four sections; hence it speaks of the third, the fourth, and so on. From "it should be known that herein" onward, the purified meaning is known by contrast. Below this there are four [points]: First, because they lack the wisdom of emptiness, they do not truly know saṃsāra, and thus with defiled minds they transmigrate in saṃsāra; this conversely explains the first [point] of the combined explanation, "not dreading nirvāṇa." Second, if through the contemplation of impermanence they loathe saṃsāra, they swiftly enter nirvāṇa; this conversely explains the second [point] of the combined explanation, "also not having great longing for nirvāṇa." Third, if because of lacking wisdom they dread nirvāṇa in their deep mind, then they cannot fulfill the provisions capable of realizing nirvāṇa and constantly dwell in saṃsāra; this conversely explains the third [point] above, "staying far away from pure resolute faith in all dharmas," and so forth. Fourth, if because of lacking compassion they dwell extensively in the joy of detachment in that nirvāṇa, they will immediately and swiftly enter parinirvāṇa; this conversely explains the fourth [point], "being unable to mature the Buddha-dharmas and sentient beings." Now concluding the converse explanation, the treatise states: "these bodhisattvas lack great expedient means for unsurpassed, complete, and perfect awakening." Next, the third type of explanation of the four meanings can be understood by reasoning based on the text. Or, first, the four meanings are directly clarified—this initially establishes the thesis; from "it should be known that herein" onward, the converse explanation reiterates and explains the preceding meaning. Within the reiterative explanation there are two [parts]: first, the converse explanation of the four meanings; second, the direct explanation of the four meanings.