瑜伽師地論略纂 10.76

10.76

論大文第七、意欲明所執非有，依他、圓成是有。如所執諸法稱言，今欲非之，說諸法離言。離言之法正是自宗，欲顯實破他，簡非取是，豈以直言乃云諸法離言也？須有道理故。

The seventh major section of the treatise intends to clarify that what is imagined does not exist, whereas other-dependent nature and consummate nature do exist. As all dharmas as imagined correspond to designations, now wishing to negate this, it is said that all dharmas are ineffable. Ineffable dharmas are precisely our own school's doctrine; wishing to reveal the real and refute the other, selecting what is correct and rejecting what is false, how could one merely rely on verbal statement to claim that all dharmas are ineffable? There must be logical justification.