瑜伽師地論略纂 14.39

14.39

論解空界色中云「當知此亦依止聚色」者，如《俱舍論》第一卷末名隣阿伽色，阿伽是極礙，此色隣彼，即此中依止聲色等處，而有空界色。　此中，解明暗相續下，如前〈本地〉第三卷解，然法師准此空界即明闇色。若爾，何故離光明外別立耶？光明質方故，別相立光明。此空於餘物處受用者別故，五無無界。

Where the treatise explains form of the space element, saying: 'It should be known that this also relies on aggregated forms': as at the end of fascicle 1 of the Abhidharmakośa-śāstra, it is named form neighboring aghā; aghā means ultimate obstruction, and this form neighbors that; that is, right here, based on places of sound, form, and so forth, there is the form of the space element. In this section, the explanation below of the continuity of light and darkness is as explained previously in fascicle 3 of the 'Maulī Bhūmi'; however, according to the Dharma Master, this space element is precisely the forms of light and darkness. If so, why is it established separately apart from radiance? Because the substance of radiance has directional extent, radiance is established as a distinct characteristic. This space is different in its utility at the locations of other objects; therefore, the five non-existent elements do not exist.