瑜伽師地論略纂 14.43

14.43

論云「又法處所攝勝定果色，當知此色唯依勝定，不依大種」等，若此中與上相違，已如前會。有謂此中唯為造色觀，無期觀大種，故定中不變為大種；從定前影像本質色說，亦同得名大造。前據辨期心變大種為論，故定中造色亦變為大種，此處不然，故有別也。　問曰：期心不為大，觀中無大種；期心不為造，觀中無造色，唯有大種耶？故知取前會為勝。

The treatise says: "Furthermore, with respect to form resulting from superior concentration subsumed under the dhātu of phenomena, it should be known that this form relies solely on superior concentration and does not rely on the great elements," and so forth. If this contradicts what is above, it has already been harmonized previously. Some say that here, the contemplation is solely for the purpose of derived form without an intended contemplation of the great elements; therefore in concentration one does not transform into the great elements. Spoken from the perspective of the form of the image and the fundamental substance prior to concentration, it also equally obtains the designation of being produced by the great elements. The previous passage was discussed based on determining that the mind transforms into the great elements, and thus derived form in concentration also transforms into the great elements; here it is not so, and thus there is a difference. Question: If the intended mind is not for the great elements, then in the contemplation there are no great elements; if the intended mind is not for derived form, then in the contemplation there is no derived form, and there are only the great elements? Therefore, we know that taking the previous harmonization is superior.