瑜伽師地論略纂 14.91

14.91

論云「尋、伺二種發語言心加行分」者，此能發語言謂思數，此是思之一分，故名發語言心加行分耶。如《對法》，名推度、不推度位。此中如《對法》，應是貪等分中，應有相違。勘之西方，更有異立有實者，此中法師不云，如《對法》及古抄，尋之如別抄。

The treatise says, "Investigation and scrutiny are portions of the preparatory application of the mind that produces speech." Does this mean that what can produce speech is the caitta of volition, and these are a portion of volition, which is why they are called portions of the preparatory application of the mind that produces speech? As in the Abhidharma-samuccaya, they are called the states of inquiring and non-inquiring. Here, as in the Abhidharma-samuccaya, they should be portions of greed, etc., which should present a contradiction. Investigate this in the Western region, where there are further differing assertions holding them to be substantially real; here the Dharma Master does not state it, but investigate it as found in the Abhidharma-samuccaya and old notes, as in the separate notes.