瑜伽師地論略纂 15.10

15.10

論解名身等中云「此復三種，謂假設名身」等，可知隨文有立名等，亦依香、味等上立，故非心非色，以名等是非色非心故者。若爾，香等可不是者也？即名通善性，此未轉今此土所立故。

In the treatise's explanation of nominal sets (nāmakāya) and so forth, it says: "Furthermore, these are of three kinds, namely nominal sets of hypothetical designation," etc. It should be understood that designations are posited according to the text, and are also posited on the basis of odors, tastes, and so forth; thus they are neither mind nor matter, since names and so forth are neither material nor mental. If so, could odors, etc., not be [so posited]? That is, names extend to the nature of goodness, which are posited here in this land prior to the transformation [of the basis].