瑜伽師地論略纂 15.150

15.150

論云「當言全界一切煩惱皆結生耶？為不全耶？答：當言全，非不全」者，此問潤生，非發業。發業雖十煩惱，修道無記，上界煩惱貪等即不發業。故今據潤生，我愛為正潤，餘為助潤。如下自出，為破小乘唯貪潤生故也。《對法》據正潤，故唯言我愛，不相違也。

Regarding the treatise's statement, "Should one say that all afflictions of the entire realm moisten rebirth? Or not all? Answer: One should say all, not not all": this asks about moistening rebirth, not initiating karma. Although there are ten afflictions that initiate karma, they are indeterminate in the path of cultivation, and afflictions such as greed in the higher realms do not initiate karma. Therefore, present [discussion] is based on moistening rebirth: self-love is the primary moistener, and the rest are auxiliary moisteners. As explained by itself below, it is meant to refute the Hīnayāna position that only greed moistens rebirth. The Abhidharma[-samuccaya] speaks only of self-love based on primary moistening, so there is no contradiction.