瑜伽師地論略纂 2.143

2.143

尋伺決擇中，諸尋伺必是分別，《唯識》第七亦有兩師：一云分別唯有漏，五法之中第三分別也，故尋伺體不通無漏也；二云分別通無漏，後得智俱有分別故，即尋伺體亦通無漏。此分別言，非五法中之分別也。以狹問寬故，順前句答，亦廣如彼。

In the determination of vitarka and vicāra, all vitarka and vicāra must be conceptual discrimination (vikalpa). Fascicle seven of the Cheng weishi lun also has two masters: one says conceptual discrimination is solely defiled, being the third, conceptual discrimination, among the five dharmas, so the substance of vitarka and vicāra does not extend to the undefiled; the second says conceptual discrimination extends to the undefiled, because it is associated with subsequent attainment wisdom, and thus the substance of vitarka and vicāra also extends to the undefiled. This word "conceptual discrimination" is not the conceptual discrimination among the five dharmas. Because a narrow [category] is asked of a broad [category], it is answered in accordance with the prior proposition, as also explained in detail there.